Why I don’t like Bernie


Not buying the Gospel of Bernie


In 2015, Bernie Sanders was asked a question about gun control and answered as below:

Q: The parents of one of the 12 innocent people killed during the Aurora movie theater shooting, sued to hold ammunition sellers liable for the attack, but their lawsuit was dismissed. And one of the reasons was a law that you voted for which protects manufacturers of ammunition from being sued. Why did you vote that way?

SANDERS: We have been yelling and screaming at each other about guns for decades, with very little success. I come from a state that has virtually no gun control. But the people of my state understand, I think, pretty clearly, that guns in Vermont are not the same thing as guns in Chicago or guns in Los Angeles. In our state, guns are used for hunting. In Chicago, they’re used for kids in gangs killing other kids or people shooting at police officers, shooting down innocent people. We need a sensible debate about gun control which overcomes the cultural divide that exists in this country. And I think I can play an important role in this. [emphasis mine]

What the fuck.

So he’s saying that in Vermont, guns aren’t used for violence, only for hunting, while in Chicago they’re only used for “shooting down innocent people” and not for legal self-protection like in Vermont. There’s a problem with each facet of his statement, which a) ignores both inevitable violence when people have guns and b) assumes guns are only used for bad purposes in Chicago–really implying that it’s black/brown criminals who use guns for bad purposes there. Addressing each more in full:

a) Obviously crime happens in Vermont, and guns play no small part. For example, with regard to the number of women murdered by men, Vermont has the eighth highest rate of any state. Of the women killed by men they knew, three-quarters were intimate partners (wives, ex-wives, or girlfriends) and a full two-thirds were shot to death. So yeah, guns are used for “bad reasons” in Vermont, not just for hunting. These numbers get ignored since who cares about violence against women? They probably did something to deserve it.

b) Presumably a great deal of gun ownership in Chicago is for the same reason that Vermonters are obsessed with guns–self-protection. And I imagine a lot of those people, maybe gasp, even black and other colored people, own guns to protect themselves, not to commit crimes! Or people who live in Chicago might like to go hunting too! But who cares, black and brown people are all criminals, they shouldn’t be allowed to have guns. There’s no gangs in Vermont, no no.

This kind of attitude is why a lot of POC don’t like Sanders. He puts us into broadly generalized, usually negative categories and in the process, glosses over tremendously important issues that affect POC and/or women. As a WOC, this infuriates me. When push comes to shove, he is really going after blue-collared white male votes, and if we’re being honest, I don’t think they really care about my right to bodily integrity or wage equality or being murdered by a man whose advances I rejected, at least not in the place of unattainable unicorns like single-payer and free college.

Sanders supporters insist that this kind of attitude is confined to a few bad apple Berniebros, but I don’t believe it. And as much as people insist Sanders is ideologically pure and all that, he’s still a politician in a democratic system–and in such a system, it is his job as the representative of the people to do the will of the people. And whatever he personally believes about gun control, through his record Sanders has indicated that he bends to the will of his constituents. Which he should have done, since that’s what this system is supposed to do–have elected official represent the will of the people.

I get that things are messed up. But as Clinton haters like to say, “I just don’t trust him.” Unlike Clinton haters, I actually have an articulated reason. I know I won’t convince any Sanders supporters to instead support Clinton for this kind of thing, but I hope some Sanders supporters can understand why people like me haven’t jumped on the Sanders ship.



2 thoughts on “Why I don’t like Bernie

  1. I can accept your reasons. I’m a pacifist myself, so I can’t get with any of the major party candidates about drones, making war, selling weapons systems or capital punishment – all of which I see as more important than issues about individual gun ownership.

    Either Democrat is fine, though I personally prefer Bernie because he has more personal charisma, and has managed to work better with both sides of the aisle in Congress. Mrs. Clinton has the disadvantage of growing up a Second Wave Feminist. That projection of being an invulnerable superwoman that was probably necessary at the early stages of her career, is now the same persona voters perceive as “cold” or “guarded” or “dishonest”. She isn’t generating excitement because she doesn’t SEEM to want to take any substantial risks to make things better.

    However, if there’s a continuing trend of terrorist acts, people will be scared and vote HRC as a safety/security candidate. In any case, Trump’s likely to be the opponent, and either Democrat can slay that monster.


    1. Thanks for your comment! And a second thanks for giving me insight into why you support Bernie.

      The “disadvantage” of growing up a Second Wave feminist is an interesting one. I think about it sometimes, too. It does seem like the steely padded shoulder thing was inevitable for any woman who wanted to get ahead in the 70s/80s. I can also understand why she might choose to keep that public persona even if it might not seem necessary, because as far as American society has come, a significant portion of the population (both men and women!) still believe that women are too emotional or hysterical to hold the highest office in the land. So she might feel that she has to continue to prove her mental fortitude.

      But I agree, it can definitely come off as a bit closed off or not being very genuine, which is something that humans dislike–I think that’s a part of why many people viscerally hate her. It’s a tough world out there for ambitious women…

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s